Edit
Taking into account time served
Labour's star chamber finds Livingstone not guilty of anti-Semitism but suspends him for two years for "bringing the party into disrepute". Probably about right!
- The Guardian tells the story and para-phrases those who think he should have been permanently expelled ... we should bear in mind that the ECHR has stated that no court (in Europe) has the right to pass a permanent sentence.
- Labour suspends Ken Livingstone for a year over Hitler commentsFormer London mayor punished for repeated claims that Adolf Hitler supported Zionism
- His (Jewish) defenders speak,
- Jewish Labour Party members slam decision to suspend Ken LivingstonePRESS RELEASEFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – 04/04/2017 Jewish Labour Party members slam decision to suspend Ken Livingstone Statement from Jewish Labour Party members who gave evidence in support of Ken Livingstone at his hearing for alleged conduct
- and for balance I post this New Statesman article which catalogues the anti-ant-Zionists charges against Livingstone, quoting the Sun journalist and MP, Michael Duger.
- Labour refuses to expel Ken Livingstone for comments on Hitler and ZionismThe former Mayor of London will be suspended from holding party office for a year.
- Tim wrote this, earlier this year, and highlight the fact that Livingstone can't and won't apologise that's the problem, although I disagree that expulsion is necessarily a suitable punishment.
- As said, I oppose permanent expulsion for any reason and consider the five year/seven year moratorium on sentence review too long. We should note that a suspended member can only attend their branch meetings (unless the terms of the suspension prohibit that, which is more normally used for abuse and bullying offences and is designed to protect victims.)
- I have also kept my mouth shut on this issue; it's too dangerous, but I admire those who stick to their principles.
- Ben Sellers seems to agree wih me
- Ken Livingstone: the tangled webDo I think Ken Livingstone is an anti-Semite? No. Is that important? Yes. Do I think his unsolicited defence of Naz Shah was necessary or clever? Absolutely not. Are elements of the Labour right ex…
- David Baddiel, sadly for me does not.
- Why Ken Livingstone has it so wrong over Hitler and Zionism | David BaddielIn confusing interpretations for facts he reveals that sense that runs deep in the left: that Jews don’t quite fit into the category of ‘the oppressed’
- But then there are some who think livingstone has "Hitler" tourettes