Corbyn & Digital Politics

In the 2016 Labour Leadership election, Jeremy Corbyn and Richard Barbrook produced a "Digital Democracy" manifesto, calling for Universal Broadband, a national wikipedia for educational material, public funding gets public domain, a right to publish, net neutrality, fair intellectual property laws, co-operative digital platforms, employee protection for suppliers to digital platforms, a national (but virtual id card), a weak commitment to open source, a digital charter of rights guaranteeing historic rights and especially the right to privacy, and electronic town halls.

The .pdf document URL generates a storify error (as does my wiki mirror) so my mirror host for the actual manifesto is here.... at  http://wiki.davelevy.info/corbyn-on-digital/ …

Paul Bernel wasn't so keen, taking objection to the Digital Passport and expressing some sadness that yet again a Labour policy document had failed to address and counter Labour's 20 year (or longer) supine delivery of civil liberty restraint at the behest of the security services.

I am pretty much with Paul in that it ignores the development of thinking around civil liberties and its conflict with the anglosphere's security services once secret plans to "master the internet". Freedom of Speech, the right to privacy, freedom of association and the right to a fair trial are all under threat from so-called democratic governments; many campaigners have developed demands and thought about what a good internet looks like. This document doesn't really build on them.

My attempt to summarise this newer Left thinking is best stated in the following two articles.

In the second, (see above of these posts) I repeat my categorisation of the EDRi charter as supporting citizenship activism, defending privacy from corporate and state surveillance, promoting equality before the law and seeking to ensure a democratically regulated internet. I suggest that this builds on two of the last Labour Government’s greatest democratic reforms, the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act and the Human Rights Act (HRA).

David Golumbia looks at the use of language by the Cyberlibertarians and the trap that their positive semantics sets for the Left. They too often define freedom as a freedom for the rich and corporations. The Left must set its own goals.

Golumbia bookmarks Barbrook's Californian Ideology, Barbrook's anti-rightist manifesto which I have not yet read.